Skip to content

Part of The Civic Trust Network

A new campaign was launched today (23 January 2007) at www.planningdisaster.co.uk in response to concerns that proposed changes to the planning system will reduce public involvement in decisions about the development of their communities. The campaign, launched by a coalition of the UK’s leading environmental and social organisations is calling on members of the public to email the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, to highlight their concerns.

The coalition of organisations including the Campaign to Protect Rural England, The Civic Trust, Friends of the Earth, The Ramblers Association, RSPB, Transport 2000, Wildlife Trusts and the Woodland Trust are calling on the Prime Minister to protect people’s rights in the planning system.

As Chancellor, he has already presided over the publication of two major reports - The Barker Review, and the Eddington Study on Transport – which put forward a series of planning reform proposals including changes to the way major infrastructure projects such as motorways and power plants are decided, and a presumption in favour of development.

The Government has already committed to a new White Paper on planning in spring this year that will take forward the Barker Review and Eddington Study recommendations.

Key concerns include:
• The reduction of public involvement in inquiries in order to speed up major projects
• Increased domination of supermarkets in town centres at the expense of local shops
• The reduction of people ’s right to have a say in planning proposals for in their area
• That w ildlife, habitats and green belts under threat from development

The coalition believes that the Prime Minister should instead:
• Ensure that major projects such as roads or nuclear power stations are decided with local input, democratic accountability, and in the framework of sustainable development;
• Support local shops and town centres by retaining and strengthening the needs assessment requirement;
• Ensure sustainable development principles guide development so that wildlife, habitats and greenbelt are protected, regeneration is encouraged and town centres remain vibrant;
• Safeguard people’s right to have a say in local plans by retaining and strengthening the issues and options discussion at the beginning of local plans, and funding greater positive participation in planning.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England’s Head of Planning , Marina Pacheco, said :

‘The English countryside will be much more open to development if the Barker review is implemented. We must not allow economics to be the main driver of how England will develop, environmental sustainability and quality of life should be given equal consideration.”

The Civic Trust’s Hannah Mummery said:
“If implemented, proposals to remove the “Needs test”, as part of the planning process for retail development would lead to the domination of supermarkets at the expense of local shops and at could put the clock back to the days of unsustainable out of town developments. We believe that this proposed reform could undo the achievements of the “town centre first” policy and would prove to be a huge blow to the viability of local shopping.”

Friends of the Earth’s Planning Advisor, Hugh Ellis, said:
“Local people and communities will lose out if the reviews are implemented. The Government must ensure that people have a say on the future of their communities and their environment as part of a robust land-use planning system.”

The Ramblers Association’s Countryside Campaign Manager, Patrick Grady, said :
“What government and big businesses see as red tape and bureaucracy, we see as vital local democracy and participation. Government must protect, not reduce, greenbelt and open spaces if people are to get the health and wellbeing benefits associated with the outdoors.”

Transport 2000’s Transport Round-table Coordinator, Denise Carlo, said:
“The effect of the Barker and Eddington proposals would be to create a separate planning system for major infrastructure projects, such as new airport runways and motorways, in parallel to the existing well-established and respected planning system. It would bypass local democratic accountability and local communities and would in our view be anti-democratic”.

The Woodland Trust’s Head of Campaigns, Ed Pomfret said :
“Proposals for speeding up major infrastructure projects and introducing a stronger presumption in favour of development is an act of folly. The Government needs to recognise that in the face of threats like climate change, environmental protection is ever more important. Reducing local community involvement and cutting back protection of habitats such as ancient woodland in the wider countryside is the opposite of what we should be doing. The Woodland Trust is currently dealing with over 390 cases of ancient woods under threat and these plans will only increase the number of cases we have to fight.”

Notes for Editors

Notes for editors

For more information and to arrange interviews
Neil Sinden or Marina Pacheco at The Campaign to Protect Rural England on 020 7981 2831 and 07739 332 795
Steve Rackett or Hannah Mummery at The Civic Trust on 020 7539 7910
Hugh Ellis or Naomi Luhde-Thompson at Friends of the Earth on 020 7566 698 or 07932 628 969 . Or the press office on 0207 566 1649
Patrick Grady at the Rambler’s Association on 020 7339 8571
Simon Marsh at the RSPB on 07969 245 717
Denise Carlo at Transport 2000 on 01603 504563
Ed Pomfret at The Woodland Trust on 07887 821 629

Kate Barker began her review of England’s land use planning system in January 2006. The final report was published in December 2006.
Sir Rod Eddington was jointly commissioned by the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Secretary of State for Transport to examine the long-term links between transport and the UK’s economic productivity, growth and stability. The study was published in December 2006.